Monday, June 13, 2011

Eurasian Social Hierarchies 500B.C.E.-500C.E.

Eurasian Social Hierarchies 500B.C.E.-500C.E.



Intro
-       Social structures have existed throughout history
·      Referred to differently (caste, patriarchy, slavery etc.)
·      Have diminish but not disappeared
-       Eurasia’s contemporary descendants represent “second wave” civilization way of living
·      Live in empires and states
·      Way of living derived from local folkways and teaching of great religious or cultural traditions of civilization
·      Established societies exemplified hierarchies between different groups
·      Chinese, Indian, Mediterranean civilizations represent different organizations of social life
·      Social patterns have a particular way of differentiating between civilizations
Society and the State in Classical China
•              Shaped by actions of the state
•              Officials, bureaucrats acted in name of emperor in the capital and in provinces (represented the elite)
•              Choose officials based on performance
An Elite of Officials
•              Emperor Wu Di made academies for potential officials to be trained
•              Open to all men but preferred the wealthy and those with connections
•              Those who entered had great prestige and high privileges
•              Creators of Chinese culture
The Landlord Class
•              Land is representation of wealth 
•              Pressures of China caused impoverished peasants to sell their land
•              Landlords evaded many common duties putting burden of peasants
•              8 C.E. Wang Mang attempted to change things was unsuccessful
•              23 C.E. Wang Mang assassinated
•              Large landowning families remained central in Chinese society
Peasants
•              Peasants have been majority of China civilization
•              Making enough to support families others making enough to survive
•              Life of peasants was vulnerable
•              Impoverished and desperate peasants began joining gangs of bandits
•              peasants began to join along Yellow River resulted in misery landless poverty
•              Peasants uprising known as Yellow Turban Rebellion(ideology from Daoism)
•              Yellow Turban Rebellion contributed to overthrow of the dynasty
•              Peasants movements have helped in the collapse of dynasties
Merchants
•              To scholar-gentry peasants were backbone of country
•              Merchants viewed as unproductive and as a social threat
•              State authorities kept merchants under control
•              Merchants were treated unfairly but despite that they became wealthy
Class and Caste in India
·      Cast in India are prominent patterns of social life ordained by god
·      Birth determined social status but there is social mobility
·      Indian has a caste system
Caste as Varna
·      derived from racially defined encounters
·      India’s caste are based more on economic specialization and culture than on race 
·      500 B.C.E., society based on four classes known as varna
·      People remained in the classes they were born into for life
o   Brahmins- priests were at the top of system
o   Ksatriya- warriors and rulers charged with protecting and governing society
o   Vaisya- originally commoners who cultivated the land
o   Surdas- native people that took subordinate positions in margins of Aryan society
·      Brahmins, Ksatriya’s and Vaisya’s were pure Aryan’s
·      Caste were formed from body of the god Purusha
·      The untouchables was a new class that emerged and they did the most uncean and polluting jobs.
Caste as Jati
·      Social distinctions that came from specific occupations
·      Varna and jatis blended together
·      Classes were broken into subclasses
·      Notion of ritual purity and pollution applied to caste systems
·      Notion of karma, dharma and rebirth based of Hinduism supported inequality
·      Jati could expel members
The Functions of Caste
·      Caste based society focused regions and specific territories thus weakend the state
·      Caste+Hinduisms shared culture=integrative mechanism of state
·      Offered some social organization
·      Offered place for diverse groups of people
·      Allows poor to be exploited by the wealthy and powerful
Slavery in the Classical Era: The Cast of the Roman Empire
·      Slavery as a way of oppression rooted in human history
·      Slaves associated to animals
·      Slaves as property
Slavery and Civilization
·      Slavery comes with certain implications
·      Slaves lack rights and independency in greater society
·      Slavery is a tradition recognized and established in different parts of the world
·      Slaves systems differ depending on civilizations
The Making of a Slave Society: The Case of Rome
·      Slavery played a big part in Greco-Rome society
·      Slaves were one third of the total population in Athens
·      Most people had slaves even the poor
·      Slaves could be granted freedom but even they did not have the same rights as others
·      People became slaves in different ways (being captured during war, abandoned children etc.)
·      No specific racial or ethnic group was identified with roman slavery
·      No job disregarded to slaves only military
·      Life of a slave depended on the master
Resistance and Rebellion
·      Slaves did what they could to rebel (suicide, theft, working poorly etc.)
·      Runaway slaves in most cases were murdered
·      Notable case of rebellion of seventy other slaves led by Spartacus
·      Although there were save rebellion they did not significantly affect the slave system.
Comparing Patriarchies of the Classical Era
·      Most significant division has been the one of gender
·      Gender differences favor the male
·      Gender differences have shaped the classical civilization
·      Gender systems are influenced by world religion, interaction of diverse people.
·      Patriarchy varied from one civilization to another and also interrelate with class
A Changing Patriarchy: The Case of China
·      For Chinese patriarchy became more evident and geared toward Confucian ideology
·      Yang related to male and superiority and yin is related to female inferiority
·      Male have public and political while women have domestic and private
·      Women’s subordination to her father then husband and finally to her son
·      When women exercised power there was negativity associated with it
·      Women were appreciated because they can carry male lineage
·      As Han dynasty fell and Daoism and Buddhism rose patriarchy lost power in classical China
·      Patriarchy diminished with the rise of Buddhism and Daoism in China
Contrasting Patriarchies in Athens and Sparta
·      Patriarchies varied depending on location
·      Athens views of women were more restrictive than those of Spartan
·      Men‘s roles in Athens were growing while women roles became more limited
·      Role of women in Sparta was to have sons so they can go in the military
·      In Sparta women were encouraged to take part in sporting events like wrestling.
Reflections: Arguing with Solomon and Buddha
·      King Solomon- views about “essential changelessness and futility of human life”
·      Buddhist- “everything changes: nothing remains without change”
·      Things change but they do not completely vanish 

No comments:

Post a Comment