Monday, June 13, 2011

Eurasian Social Hierarchies 500B.C.E.-500C.E.

Eurasian Social Hierarchies 500B.C.E.-500C.E.



Intro
-       Social structures have existed throughout history
·      Referred to differently (caste, patriarchy, slavery etc.)
·      Have diminish but not disappeared
-       Eurasia’s contemporary descendants represent “second wave” civilization way of living
·      Live in empires and states
·      Way of living derived from local folkways and teaching of great religious or cultural traditions of civilization
·      Established societies exemplified hierarchies between different groups
·      Chinese, Indian, Mediterranean civilizations represent different organizations of social life
·      Social patterns have a particular way of differentiating between civilizations
Society and the State in Classical China
              Shaped by actions of the state
              Officials, bureaucrats acted in name of emperor in the capital and in provinces (represented the elite)
              Choose officials based on performance
An Elite of Officials
              Emperor Wu Di made academies for potential officials to be trained
              Open to all men but preferred the wealthy and those with connections
              Those who entered had great prestige and high privileges
              Creators of Chinese culture
The Landlord Class
              Land is representation of wealth 
              Pressures of China caused impoverished peasants to sell their land
              Landlords evaded many common duties putting burden of peasants
              8 C.E. Wang Mang attempted to change things was unsuccessful
              23 C.E. Wang Mang assassinated
              Large landowning families remained central in Chinese society
Peasants
              Peasants have been majority of China civilization
              Making enough to support families others making enough to survive
              Life of peasants was vulnerable
              Impoverished and desperate peasants began joining gangs of bandits
              peasants began to join along Yellow River resulted in misery landless poverty
              Peasants uprising known as Yellow Turban Rebellion(ideology from Daoism)
              Yellow Turban Rebellion contributed to overthrow of the dynasty
              Peasants movements have helped in the collapse of dynasties
Merchants
              To scholar-gentry peasants were backbone of country
              Merchants viewed as unproductive and as a social threat
              State authorities kept merchants under control
              Merchants were treated unfairly but despite that they became wealthy
Class and Caste in India
·      Cast in India are prominent patterns of social life ordained by god
·      Birth determined social status but there is social mobility
·      Indian has a caste system
Caste as Varna
·      derived from racially defined encounters
·      India’s caste are based more on economic specialization and culture than on race 
·      500 B.C.E., society based on four classes known as varna
·      People remained in the classes they were born into for life
o   Brahmins- priests were at the top of system
o   Ksatriya- warriors and rulers charged with protecting and governing society
o   Vaisya- originally commoners who cultivated the land
o   Surdas- native people that took subordinate positions in margins of Aryan society
·      Brahmins, Ksatriya’s and Vaisya’s were pure Aryan’s
·      Caste were formed from body of the god Purusha
·      The untouchables was a new class that emerged and they did the most uncean and polluting jobs.
Caste as Jati
·      Social distinctions that came from specific occupations
·      Varna and jatis blended together
·      Classes were broken into subclasses
·      Notion of ritual purity and pollution applied to caste systems
·      Notion of karma, dharma and rebirth based of Hinduism supported inequality
·      Jati could expel members
The Functions of Caste
·      Caste based society focused regions and specific territories thus weakend the state
·      Caste+Hinduisms shared culture=integrative mechanism of state
·      Offered some social organization
·      Offered place for diverse groups of people
·      Allows poor to be exploited by the wealthy and powerful
Slavery in the Classical Era: The Cast of the Roman Empire
·      Slavery as a way of oppression rooted in human history
·      Slaves associated to animals
·      Slaves as property
Slavery and Civilization
·      Slavery comes with certain implications
·      Slaves lack rights and independency in greater society
·      Slavery is a tradition recognized and established in different parts of the world
·      Slaves systems differ depending on civilizations
The Making of a Slave Society: The Case of Rome
·      Slavery played a big part in Greco-Rome society
·      Slaves were one third of the total population in Athens
·      Most people had slaves even the poor
·      Slaves could be granted freedom but even they did not have the same rights as others
·      People became slaves in different ways (being captured during war, abandoned children etc.)
·      No specific racial or ethnic group was identified with roman slavery
·      No job disregarded to slaves only military
·      Life of a slave depended on the master
Resistance and Rebellion
·      Slaves did what they could to rebel (suicide, theft, working poorly etc.)
·      Runaway slaves in most cases were murdered
·      Notable case of rebellion of seventy other slaves led by Spartacus
·      Although there were save rebellion they did not significantly affect the slave system.
Comparing Patriarchies of the Classical Era
·      Most significant division has been the one of gender
·      Gender differences favor the male
·      Gender differences have shaped the classical civilization
·      Gender systems are influenced by world religion, interaction of diverse people.
·      Patriarchy varied from one civilization to another and also interrelate with class
A Changing Patriarchy: The Case of China
·      For Chinese patriarchy became more evident and geared toward Confucian ideology
·      Yang related to male and superiority and yin is related to female inferiority
·      Male have public and political while women have domestic and private
·      Women’s subordination to her father then husband and finally to her son
·      When women exercised power there was negativity associated with it
·      Women were appreciated because they can carry male lineage
·      As Han dynasty fell and Daoism and Buddhism rose patriarchy lost power in classical China
·      Patriarchy diminished with the rise of Buddhism and Daoism in China
Contrasting Patriarchies in Athens and Sparta
·      Patriarchies varied depending on location
·      Athens views of women were more restrictive than those of Spartan
·      Men‘s roles in Athens were growing while women roles became more limited
·      Role of women in Sparta was to have sons so they can go in the military
·      In Sparta women were encouraged to take part in sporting events like wrestling.
Reflections: Arguing with Solomon and Buddha
·      King Solomon- views about “essential changelessness and futility of human life”
·      Buddhist- “everything changes: nothing remains without change”
·      Things change but they do not completely vanish 

No comments:

Post a Comment